The Fight over UFO & UAP Transparency

The UAP discussion is currently hitting almost every major news outlet around the world right now. With the recent public congressional hearing on the subject, it appears evident to me of two massive camps drawing their lines in the sand on the subject. 1 - The former intelligence community members and allies pushing for transparency with public representatives, and 2 - the Department of Defence, Intelligence Community, and AARO. Listen in to hear my take on this now public tug of war...

UAP Battle Heats Up

(0:01 - 28:39)

Okay, this topic is getting me so like Fired up. It's so fascinating to me that I just have to like drop another app on this Because there's so much going on in this UFO UAP space right now. No, you know Look say whatever you want.

You want to have this conversation or not? No matter what you think about this stuff if you're you know, you're thinking I'm out to lunch on this I've been following this for a while and like We're years into it really like the first article dropped as I had said before like the big article that kind of woke everybody up it feels was in 2017 and that was shortly after give or take When some people stepped away from their positions Involved in the study of these types of things and so Their belief was that this information should be public and That people have a right to know. I mean, this is one of the biggest questions and you know in our whole World is are we alone in the universe? are we the only intelligent life in the universe and You know, we've been trying to ask this question, I mean it's been going on for decades and decades right and conversations about this stuff and clues and and and theories and like Confessions related to the study of these things and Possible experiences and crashes and like all this stuff, right all this stuff. So So when that happened in like 2017 it kick-started a Process and as I suggested before the players involved here are no slouches they're They're very experienced At high levels of government They understand how to work the system so to speak meaning You know, they're not just random person You know run into the city from their cabin with a you know with the Polaroid of something in the sky Bless anyone who is an experiencer like that though you know, I'm just to say case in point like that these people have experience in the halls of Authority and in governance and legal process and protocol and all of this and so This is where the actions been happening no matter what people think anywhere out there it's it's been deep and What's been happening is the Senate's been looking deeper and Congress has been looking deeper into what's been going on in this whole world and Now We all generally agree, you know the the United States is You know position in the world and in the West and You know was a Canadian like we do our own Canadian things, but we're also very close ally of the u.s. and the u.s. is of course kind of the superpower in that relationship and Not kind of but you understand I'm just being gentle with the language and so You know any sort of breakthroughs on that front it would be my Suggestion expectation so far that the u.s. would go first in any sort of disclosure event about information that comes to light With respect to this question and with respect to a discovery of Intelligent life in the universe barring some event happening, you know on someone else's Land or someone else's, you know country or similar that kind of irrefutably Supersedes that and in that kind of general process, but I would expect otherwise them to be first But it's also why the water has been boiling is because there's been a lot of indication that they know the answer to this question and have been very very reluctant to To address it or to communicate about it you know, there's certainly been a stigma around the whole topic and similar but this article really shook things up back in 2017 and It put some pressure on the other side of those who are active in this space, which are the Department of Defense the intelligence community and What was first like the the UFO office Which they've changed the the vernacular to to UAPs So instead of unidentified flying object they're using UAP which is Unidentified aerial phenomena, right? so they created this UAP task force and Then which is now Been changed again to an office called Aero, which is the all I'm gonna I might get this wrong.

It's not right in front of me the all Hang on a second. I got it here Just get it, right the all domain anomaly resolution office Weird name, right. I mean this is part of it Just kind of make these things go away in my opinion just make these names as boring as possible also I mean with all due respect to lawyers and any that might be listening.

I mean you know Lawyers aren't known as promoters. I'll say that you know, they the legal vernacular can certainly You know water things down or melt brain cells trying to follow. But anyways, that's the name Aero um So it put a lot of pressure in my opinion on that that group because they were even and I call them kind of a group because like Aero was managed through the Department of Defense and The Department of Defense is where people are suggesting things are not Fully Honest and transparent, right? And so the Department of Defense sets up its own office that says Hey Here's us we're looking into that stuff that you're concerned about and and so Let me step back for a sec.

So first off they were reluctant to even acknowledge The veracity the validity of those initial videos that came out that 2017 article like the go for the go fast and the flir and I can't remember the other one the tic-tac videos Look them up if you haven't seen them, but many have by now, so They were reluctant to even acknowledge that That was that that was real and there's a spokesperson in there who people have taken general exception with who's been very Resistant to answering questions communicating, but I'm a bit skeptical as well of of their Honesty in this matter and So, you know, so arrow has been doing this work and before that the UAP task force and apparently there's a lot of information Oh and before that a tip which is where one of the fellows Has come from Lou Elizondo And referencing his work But all of these people, you know very careful with what they can and can't talk about you know with respect to confidentiality and What they could say in public and things like this Because of their obligations because this is part of how all this works too is that people are read into these programs On a need-to-know basis and their confidentiality provisions So it goes the story goes that these are like lifetime Top secret basically You know Provisions You know Conditions in their non-disclosures with the penalty of like Life imprisonment and things like this. So it's no, you know, it's no white matter. And so so They've found other routes because they feel that These organizations are not being honest with the public and the public are The people that are funding these organizations so You know, it's not all above the board.

It's not all kosher. So this veil has been cracking and As it's been cracking and politicians on both sides of the aisle in the Senate In Congress surely the president well by now have all been Briefed on this and it's created this groundswell within the Senate and within Congress to deepen their investigations and This has been supported in provisions that have been added to the various Authorizations of those bodies and mandates for the various years On you know governing expectations use of proceeds things like this so So it's it's quite fascinating. So arrow has been More forthcoming than in the past.

I feel thus far But still has a lot of work to do and it's still questionable how forthcoming they've been and it's it's quite limited and It's my sense that they're being about as forthcoming as they need to be to continue to give the impression that they're really doing the deep work and To kind of keep any deeper interest at bay it just it just kind of smells of that And you know, I watched some of the director of that offices Past briefing and I just didn't get the sense. I just didn't get the sense. He was being totally genuine and I read people and circumstances and rooms for a living and I want to believe that's the case But it's just not the vibe.

I got I went. Yeah, I Just not sensing that this is the right person that this person is up to the task and that whatever they're doing that They're really getting it done and in some respects maybe but I'm not alone in thinking this And feeling this way and there's a bunch of others right you feel this way who hold much more power than I do in that respect in these rooms and They're questioning so last week was this milestone hearing before Congress with David brush and a couple other fellows Former military men very well credentialed with their own experiences and this hearing really cracked this thing open and I feel that this whole battle between these two realms the the public representative side of the government and the Department of Defense and intelligence community, which I would Sense I'm not I'm not sure to what extent because I'm not a you know I'm not a you know a PhD student with regard to American politics per se but on the DoD and the Intelligence community side, I believe the higher-level positions are Well, none of them are elected I mean that I feel is the case right so they're all appointed So you get this kind of schism between the two sides where one side is an elected Representatives and the other side are appointed Representatives I Believe anyone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that's the case and You've seen in this last week in the last several days since this hearing It's like massive go public of what people were saying was going on behind the scenes for a while is that there's a Group that is very resistant to to transparency and public information around this topic and They've been resisting efforts to share what we know and the other group is saying there's a lot under the hood here and They're they're now they're naming names They're they're able to point out where these things are what is going on and it is deep I mean they're talking about Crash retrieval of exotic technology. They're talking about what they What they specifically said is biologics, which I understand is like an Air Force term for like, you know Kind of like Biological entity You know generally with respect to like those that have passed but I'm not even gonna get into what we've encountered like live versus past Biologic entities, but with the general suggestion that this is all foreign.

It's exotic And and to what extent like it's not Russian it's not Chinese it's like something different non-human is the general working and The people that are coming forward have the information of like where these programs are where these materials are being stored who's working on them Who was working on them and all of this and this other side of the coin has just you know Those who wish to keep this under wraps have Really gone loud it feels in the last few days and the director for instance of arrow put out a big personal letter like you know like Claiming how insulted he is that this has come about whatever which all just seems like kind of professional survival You know like gonna prevent a professional affront that like, you know, this is happening despite his work or whatever It's it honestly like with all the respect to the director. It feels ego-driven and without any of these groups addressing any of the elements questions Evidence that this latest primary whistleblower and David Grosh has been presenting David Grosh is like Seriously credentialed like this is this is a highly decorated fellow like with Tremendous, you know support For his work over the years when I look at David he his whole vibe to me is Exactly of the type of person that I feel was in those roles the the right type of like detailed Thinker Organized professional like crisp fellow that I always have felt Personally would be in these types of seats would be at these types of desks right doing heavy intelligence related stuff Because it's a lot. I mean, you know, that's a lot to consider Serious stuff you have to be able to dot your I's and cross your T's, you know in a big big way So when I see him I'm like, yeah, that's the guy I mean that's Profile of the fellow that I always thought would was in there not just on this topic, but on any of the topics he's that type of person and so for me, I just You know He's just very forthcoming he's he's covered his bases He understands his legal rights and here's why because they recently enacted a whistleblower protection program to in its law that allows people like David to step forward and share their stories, which they didn't have before and which now Protects People like this coming forward with information and the word is that there's more coming and so it's got this other Faction it seems just on them on the ropes because the things that they've been saying have not been true and that this has been going on for decades and that Something you know Feels like it's there and even with the director of arrows letter the other day.

He didn't He didn't address any of David's Questions or is any of David's information There wasn't like a you know a response. That's it's addressing the materials It was just this whole big other energy like kind of spectacle. You know he generally says he doesn't In a letter I believe he said you know They've not found evidence of this type of thing But the reality is that from what I understand David has higher or had higher Security clearance understand.

It was just revoked a couple days ago another move to try and suppress, right? But he had a higher security clearance than then Kirkpatrick than the director of arrow and that office did so like Who would arrow be to say that he? Doesn't have that information if he was able to go deeper than that office even good to find the answers, right? So there's just a whole bunch of smoke here, and as they say when there's smoke. There's fire you know or where there's smoke there's fire, so like it's just fuming up the whole place right now and I'm watching this super closely, but I find it fascinating that these two different Factions so to speak these two different desks on this issue Have like Fully seemed to go public and into the public domain with this battle in the past few days And I would be watching and will be watching myself Which of those are substantive? Displays of Discussion and debate you know They Say don't raise your voice raise your argument and For I feel Grush in this in this community of those who are pushing for more transparency They continue to raise their argument and I feel as an example of the director of arrow of trunk Patrick's response I feel that his response he raised his voice and I feel his argument Really isn't holding up to what? What this other group is is presenting and I find that really really really interesting So in the continuing debate in the days to come which I will be watching very closely There's been news on this like by the day. It's just been Wild and fascinating because of its implications.

I mean come on if we're not The only intelligent life in the universe I'm not scared of that I find that like deeply inspiring and intriguing and like It's just like beautiful and wonderful and all these things like it I'm really really interested and really curious and excited about that so about that potential so I I will be watching as this as this jousting continues in the days and weeks to come What Presentations of the matters will be Will be raising the argument You know arrow is welcome to to to debate these details But factually right the DOD same thing factually There are many people who have seen things With their Clearances that have said as much that have not been shared with the public Okay, and so why not What aren't you showing people that only fuels the fire of speculation about how much else is not being shown right and what happens is that that position I would suggest becomes a dwindling house of cards as the cracks keep getting wider and the ground swell Demanding more transparency about these matters gets louder, and it's been getting quite loud So I'll be watching for how much of this is about character assassination and similar of you know Witnesses and whistleblowers who come forth and the facts of the case versus rebutting any of the details that are provided For instance a couple things I mean one Matt Gates who you know I'm just not even gonna get into like the individual Everybody has their opinions of his fellow, but he was at Anglin Air Force Base he suggested with William Burchette who were also very active on the congressional investigations here and He stated that after appropriate, you know explanation of the pecking order of things in The US Government in circles of authority that he was shown something that he has never seen or able to describe and that he is very confident that it is not adversarial technology and of anything in our inventory, and I say our because like we're the West you know and Canadians and Americans were great friends and I Indeed believe and feel we will continue to be for a long time You know love you guys my American friends And I also really greatly enjoy visiting your country just side notes, which I'd like to do more often And I guess also I'll say and I love having you up here so come visit any time, but more importantly That's what it's just an example that was just last week and there's another Question that was directly posed by News Nation who's been leading this this is they're really, you know Building quite a following because they're taking the lead on investigating all this stuff and good on them, you know They'd asked Lockheed Martin because Lockheed Martin had been And been referred to as a reverse engineering Partner on some of this technology and they didn't confirm nor deny. I think their language was like Answers with respect to UAP or best handled by the US government or something which didn't say no and didn't say yes, which is Probably if you had it the thread you'd want to you know, the needle you'd want to thread through that because You don't want to get caught lying And all of that sort of stuff and You also don't want to be the first to disclose these types of things because that would be not their necessary or necessarily their position or Role in this whole this whole this whole thing if you were going to disclose certain findings But anyway stuff's going on here again where there's smoke there's fire I'll be watching for those who raise their argument and challenge these positions with facts versus those who just try and discredit people by attacking them without substance and that's How I would suggest Anyone should follow this This thread this debate this this arm-wrestling this battle so to speak of more transparency around this UFO UAP issue because the implications are significant and I am of the camp and of the opinion that there's a lot of information that has not been shared How deep it goes is is to be determined, but it's pretty fascinating. How deep people are suggesting thus far and I Look forward to there being more transparency ASAP around this issue because people can handle it We're ready and it's time So those are my thoughts on that What do you think? Let's have that conversation Check out any of my links below there.

If you want to reach out to me connect with me Or similar and We'll chat with you some more on the next episode wishing you a great day and Keep tabs on this one. Actually one last point UFO Twitter if you're on Twitter Which is now X Right, which is now X. So if you're on X UFO Twitter hashtag UFO Twitter is the spot to follow this to follow this thread and like the big players and all the people talking about this all day every day, so Jump in there and we'll chat with you some more and about more of this soon I'm sure it's just it's got my attention right now. It's very interesting Have a great one