.product_section .product_form, .product_gallery { opacity: 1; } .multi_select, form .select { display: block !important; } .image-element__wrap { display: none; }

Mergers & Acquisitions: I Think of M&A as a Strategic Tool, Not a Strategy

A man walks through a business conference, illustrating the strategic question of what becomes possible after an acquisition.

I like transactions, but I do not believe a transaction is automatically a strategy.

An acquisition is a tool.

Used well, it can compress years of organic development into a single move. It can add technology, customers, people, distribution, assets, intellectual property, geographic reach or scale. It can change the competitive position of a company almost overnight.

Used badly, it can add debt, dilution, distraction and complexity while leaving the original strategic problem untouched.

So my first M&A question is not, can we buy this?

It is: what becomes possible after we own it that is not possible today?

Start with strategic fit

The target should solve something or unlock something.

Maybe it removes a growth constraint. Maybe it provides a capability that would take years to build. Maybe it creates vertical integration, consolidates a fragmented market or gives the company access to a customer base it could not efficiently reach on its own.

If the strategic logic cannot be explained simply, I become skeptical.

Price and structure are different questions

A good company can still be a bad acquisition at the wrong price.

And the headline purchase price does not tell the whole story. Cash, shares, debt, earn-outs, contingent payments, working-capital adjustments and management incentives all change the economics.

In public companies, issuing stock introduces another dimension: what are you giving up, at what implied valuation, and what value is being acquired in return?

This connects directly to the capital-allocation question running through my Public Venture Capital work: what value is being created with every new dollar and every new share issued?

The deal is not finished at closing

This is where the spreadsheet can become dangerous.

Synergies do not happen because they exist in a model. Customers do not automatically stay. Cultures do not automatically merge. Systems do not integrate themselves. Key people can leave.

The real value of an acquisition is realized after the transaction.

Before closing, I want a view of the first hundred days: leadership, communication, customer retention, people, systems, cost opportunities, revenue opportunities and the milestones that will tell us whether the strategic thesis is actually becoming real.

M&A can be one of the fastest ways to transform a company. But the transaction should serve the strategy, not become a substitute for it.

Continue exploring

This article is part of my Business & Strategy authority series. Continue with Business & Strategy hub, Unlocking Hidden Potential: How I Think About Business Strategy & Transformation, Positioning Is Strategy: If the Market Doesn't Understand the Value, the Value Is Harder to Unlock and How I Evaluate an Acquisition Target Before Getting Excited About the Deal.

Chad McMillan

Chad McMillan is a creative entrepreneur and strategic advisor with over 20 years of experience in and around the capital markets, focused on finding hidden potential in companies, ideas, markets and people, and advancing what they can become.