AI Is Collapsing the Cost of Testing Ideas

A man sits thoughtfully at a table, illustrating how AI is shrinking the distance between an idea and a practical experiment.

One of the things I find most interesting about AI is not the chatbot.

It is what AI does to the cost of trying things.

Ideas that once required a designer, developer, researcher, copywriter and analyst can sometimes be pushed surprisingly far by one person before a full team is necessary.

That changes the economics of experimentation.

It does not mean expertise disappears. It does not mean the first AI-generated version is good. And it definitely does not mean every idea should be built simply because building became easier.

It means the cost of answering could this work? is falling in many categories.

That is strategically important.

If an experiment that once cost $50,000 can be credibly tested for $5,000—or $500—you can explore a larger portfolio of possibilities before concentrating capital around the winners.

For someone like me who naturally generates a lot of concepts, that is a meaningful change.

The scarce resource begins shifting from production capacity toward judgment: which problem matters, what should be built, what does good look like, what evidence matters and when should a project earn more resources?

This is why AI fits inside Creativity & Innovation rather than sitting off by itself as a technology topic.

AI is an enabling layer. The opportunity is what people can now imagine, test and create with it.

That connects directly into Small Experiments Beat Big Assumptions and the broader Seeing What Others Miss framework.

Chad McMillan, creative entrepreneur and strategic advisor
Chad McMillan

Chad McMillan is a creative entrepreneur and strategic advisor with over 20 years of experience in and around the capital markets, focused on finding hidden potential in companies, ideas, markets and people, and advancing what they can become.

Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.


Continue Exploring

A behind-the-scenes production setting with a camera operator, illustrating the importance of matching an idea with the right vehicle.
The Right Vehicle for an Idea: Build It, Partner It, License It, Sell It or Let It Wait

A good idea does not automatically require a new company. Different ideas deserve different vehicles: operating ventures, partnerships, licensing, IP sales, creative projects or simply more time.
Read More
A man stands in a vivid purple hallway, illustrating how limited resources and constraints can encourage greater creativity.
Constraints Can Make You More Creative

Unlimited options can create paralysis. Constraints force prioritization, combinations and unconventional solutions—and can become a surprisingly powerful creative tool.
Read More
A man looks across the Vancouver skyline, illustrating the process of refining an idea until it is strong enough to become a business.
How I Decide Whether an Idea Is Worth Pursuing

I do not need every idea to become a company. I want to understand the problem, timing, differentiation, feasibility, economics, my own advantage and the right vehicle before deciding what an idea deserves.
Read More
A man looks toward the horizon at sunset, illustrating future thinking and seeing possibilities before they become mainstream.
Future Thinking: Look for What Is Becoming Possible, Not Just What Exists Today

Future thinking is not predicting exactly what happens next. It is noticing the forces changing what is possible and asking what opportunities, behaviours and systems might emerge as a result.
Read More